Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Government Website

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Safely connect using HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Audits, Inspections, and Evaluations

Report Number Title Issue Date Fiscal Year
DD-10-18 The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans is a division of the Roman Catholic Church and is the second-oldest diocese in the United States. The Archdiocese encompasses 8 civil parishes in the New Orleans metropolitan area arid includes 108 church parishes. In addition to the religious facilities of each church parish, the Archdiocese also owns primarily non-religious facilities including school buildings, elderly and disabled persons housing, and charitable assistance buildings. Hurricane Katrina's high winds and flooding caused extensive damage to many of the Archdiocese's primarily non-religious buildings. The Archdiocese accounted for disaster costs on a project-by-project basis, as required. However, the Archdiocese did not always follow federal procurement standards, arid its claim included $520,952 in ineligible costs for markups on contract costs ($510,328) and costs not incurred ($10,624).

>Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans  		2010
OIG-10-118 Efforts to Detect and Deter Fraud Committed by Immigration Services Officers 2010
DD-10-17  

>Louisiana Department Health and Hospitals 		2010
OIG-10-116  

>The State of Maryland's Management of State Homeland Security Program and Urban Areas Security Initiative Grants Awarded During Fiscal Years 2005 through 2007 		2010
OIG-10-115  

>FEMA's Management of Disaster Assistance Employee Deployment and Payroll Processes 		2010
OIG-10-117  

>CBP's Handling of Unaccompanied Alien Children 		2010
DS-10-10  

>City of Glendale, California 		2010
DD-10-16  

>Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas  		2010
OIG-10-113  

>Customs and Border Protection's Importer Self-Assessment Program 		2010
OIG-10-114  

>Federal Emergency Management Agency Mount Weather Emergency Operations Center Tenant Satisfaction Survey  ( 		2010
OIG-10-112  

>Evaluation of DHS' Security Program and Practices for Its Intelligence Systems for Fiscal Year 2010 (CONFIDENTIAL) 		2010
OIG-10-108  

>Allegations of Misconduct within the Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge Program 		2010
DA-10-17  

>City of Greenvile, South Carolina  		2010
OIG-10-111  

>DHS Needs to Improve the Security Posture of Its Cybersecurity Program Systems 		2010
OIG-10-110  

>Information Technology Management Letter for the FY 2009 DHS Integrated Audit 		2010
OIG-10-107  

> Recommendations to Improve the USCG's System for Adjudicating Suspension and Revocation Matters 		2010
DA-10-16  

>Mississippi Coast Coliseum Commission  		2010
OIG-10-109  

>Information Technology Management Letter for the FY 2009 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Financial Statement Audit 		2010
OIG-10-106  

>Annual Review of the United States Coast Guard's Mission Performance (FY 2009) 		2010
OIG-10-105  

> Funding Plan for the United States Coast Guard Museum 		2010
OIG-10-104  

>Audit of the Department of Homeland Security's Handling of Conference Fees for the Process Control Systems Forum (PCSF) ( 		2010
OIG-10-103  

>Special Review of the Science an Technology Directorate's Contracts With a Small Business 		2010
DA-10-15  

>South Mississippi Electric Power Association  		2010
DD-10-15  

>Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center  		2010
DD-10-14  

>Recovery School District - Abramson High School  		2010
DS-10-09  

>City of Napa, California 		2010
OIG-10-102  

>Review of the Department of Homeland Security's Master List of Recovery Act Contracts and Grants 		2010
DA-10-14  

>Hancock County School District, Mississippi ( 		2010
OIG-10-95  

>DHS Needs to Address Challenges to Its Financial Systems Consolidation Initiative 		2010
DA-10-13  

>Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority 		2010
DS-09-09 City of Los Angeles Department of Water & Power 2010
OIG-10-101  

>FEMA's Logistics Management Process for Responding to Catastrophic Disasters 		2010
DD-10-13  

>Greene County, Missouri  		2010
DD-10-12  

>Orleans Levee District 		2010
OIG-10-100  

>Immigration and Customs Enforcement Privacy Stewardship 		2010
OIG-10-99  

>Management Oversight and Component Participation Are Necessary to CompleteDHS' Human Resource Systems Consolidation Effort 		2010
OIG-10-98  

>FEMA's Disaster Assistance Improvement Plan 		2010
DD-10-11 We audited Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) funds awarded to the City of Kettering, Ohio (Report Number DD-09-14), the City of North Royalton, Ohio (Report Number DD-10-7), and the City of Bucyrus, Ohio (Report Number DD-10-09), between March 2009 and April 2010. During these audits, we identified conditions that warranted further examination. OEMA did not always comply with FEMA guidelines when aggregating properties into HMGP projects because FEMA Region V did not enforce its guidelines. As a result, certain properties did 11ot meet HMGP eligibility requirements. Additionally, FEMA and the state did not meet all required project submission and approval timeframes, which delayed the obligation ofproject funds and the implementation of approved mitigation work.

>Management Issues Identified During Hazard Mitigation Grant Audits In the State of Ohio 		2010
DD-10-10  

>Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, NE  		2010
OIG-10-96 We conducted an audit of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s control of its Secure Border Initiative technology program. Our objective was to determine whether the program office has implemented adequate controls to ensure that cost overruns are avoided and established milestones are met. To accomplish this objective, we reviewed four task orders for the program in fiscal year 2008, totaling approximately $267 million. Customs and Border Protection needs to improve its control of contractor activities on the Secure Border Initiative technology program. Specifically, program officials did not ensure that contractors maintain up-to-date information in the primary management tool designed to provide managers with advance information regarding potential cost overruns and program progress.

>Controls Over SBInet Program Cost and Schedule Could Be Improved 		2010
OIG-10-93  

>Information Technology Management Letter for the FY 2009 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Financial Statement Audit 		2010
OIG-10-94  

>U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team Makes Progress in Securing Cyberspace, but Challenges Remain 		2010
DS-10-08  

>FEMA's Practices for Evaluating Insurance Coverage for Disaster Damage and Determining Project Eligibility and Costs  		2010
DA-10-12  

>City of Hialeah, Florida  		2010
DA-10-11  

>Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority 		2010
OIG-10-92  

>Information Technology Management Letter for the Federal Emergency Management Agency Component of the FY 2009 DHS Integrated Audit 		2010
OIG-10-90  

>Immigration and Customs Enforcement Information Technology Management Progresses But Challenges Remain  		2010
OIG-10-89  

>The Coast Guard's Maritime Safety and Security Team Program  		2010
OIG-10-88  

>Special Report: Summary of Significant Investigations October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009 		2010
OIG-10-91  

>Improving FEMA's Disaster Purchase Card Program 		2010

*NDAA, Pub. L. 117-263, section 5274 Response Received. View responses

Return to top of page